🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."